While we all agree that each medical history and document is confidential and carries sensitive information about the patient undergoing treatment and can not be revealed to a third person. However, by simple logic that its my treatment process, I have full right to know about it! How can I be denied of my right to access my own treatment document?
We have had several examples where persons were forcefully admitted in to mental institutions since their spouses or family members observed certain "symptoms" and the patient never came out since there exist no process that can be initiated by the patient himself even if he is all right. Such methods have often been put to (mis)use by husbands against the wives to settle matrimonial cases and in many other cases, by other family members to grab the control on the property of the victim.
In the instant case before the Delhi High Court, the High Court has overruled the decision of the Central Information Commission that had directed the hospital IHBAS to provide the info to the patient. The judiciary need to be more sensitive and aware of the rights of persons with disabilities given India's commitment to UNCRPD and the regime of right to information besides the Indian Constitution that assures to all citizens equality before law. The document related to medical (psychiatric) treatment must be provided to the patient. Could they have done same with a heart patient or a kidney patient?
While the hospital may refuse husband or other family members citing confidentiality, the patient has the first right to access her treatment documents and she has a right to second medical opinion on the basis of the treatment record. Its not the property of the hospital!
Here is the news from Indian Express.
Disclose psychiatric info under RTI ? Yes, says CIC; No, says HC
Pritha Chatterjee : New Delhi, Tue Apr 24 2012,
Do psychiatry patients have the right to access records of their treatment? While the Central Information Commission (CIC) directed a mental health hospital to provide this information to a patient, the hospital has moved court citing confidentiality.
The Delhi High Court has given the Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences (IHBAS) a stay order against disclosing the information till the next hearing in September.
The case pertains to a 32-year-old married woman. She was admitted to IHABS in April 2011 by the hospital’s mobile health unit from her Gurgaon home, after her husband approached hospital with her “symptoms”.
According to Dr Nimesh Desai, director of IHBAS, “Confidentiality of psychiatric information — which includes all information disclosed by different parties related to the patient for treatment purposes — is a very fundamental concept. It is something every psychiatrist promises his interviewees verbally. Unfortunately, till date, India does not have a legal provision regarding this. The unique nature of this information — which includes historical information of the patient, his or her recollections, fantasies, feelings, fears and preoccupations from the past as well as in the present — distinguishes it from other medical records.”
The patient was discharged after four days and has since been staying with her mother in Bhopal. After her discharge, she filed an RTI seeking “the basis for my admission, doctor’s observation, and clinical examination reports, and doctor’s observation...”
Meanwhile, the patient’s husband, too, filed an RTI application, seeking the reasons of his wife’s discharge, “without my information.”
In both cases, IHBAS authorities stated that “the information sought was provided by the patient and her husband, which is sensitive/confidential in nature.”
“The need for discretion in disclosing psychiatric information is compounded in cases like this, where there is a possible marital discord and each seeks such history to use against the other,” Dr Desai said.
The December 2011 CIC order by Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi stated that while the hospital was exempted from disclosing treatment records to anyone other than the patient, “these precedents are not relevant when the information is being sought by the patient herself”.
Arguing against this, in their writ before the High Court, IHBAS said, “that every party disclosed information in confidentiality to the psychiatrist and the hospital should not give it away to anyone, including the patient.”
The disclosure of information contained in psychiatry case records would discourage the patients and their relatives to furnish personal and sensitive information and they would prefer to withhold such information, which would largely affect the treatment,” the writ stated.
Meanwhile, the patient’s family said they were “exploring legal options, on this violation of the CIC order.”
Source: Indian Express